Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 26 Dec 2000 21:53:17 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: sysmips call and glibc atomic set |
| |
Hi!
> > Not having swap doesn't mean you're safe. Think of any kind of previously > > unmapped page. > > > > Is there a reason why it doesn't just force that page to be mapped > first?
You can map it in... But background daemon can map it out in the meantime :-). You'd have to map in and pagelock. Pavel
-- I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care." Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |