[lkml]   [2000]   [Dec]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: TCP keepalive seems to send to only one port
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 12:52:12PM +1100, James Morris wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:
> > Then what do you do when you are behind a NAT? And how do you expire entries in
> > ESTABLISHED state that could stay lingering forever without some sort of
> > keepalive? (The FINs might have been lost due to a conectivity transient, so
> > you can have another perfectly valid and alive connection with the same host,
> > and application-level timeouts are useless for some applications
> > (*cough*nc*cough*))
> Typically, you choose a practical value for timing out inactive but
> otherwise seemingly established TCP connections. The 2.4 connection
> tracking code (used for NAT) uses a value of five days for this.

Yeah. But I'm stuck with a NAT (which isn't mine, btw) which uses
(according to nmap). Which had a default of 15 *minutes* (as I read in a HOWTO
somewhere). I'm trying to convince the sysadmin to raise it to two hours, but I
bet it'll be hard.

Cesar Eduardo Barros
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.118 / U:0.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site