[lkml]   [2000]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Wiring down Pages
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Robert Read wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 06:46:33PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> > page_cache_drop(page); <= removes your extra count
> I can't find that function, do you mean page_cache_free() and
> page_cache_release(), both are aliases for __free_page(). Maybe
> we need another alias. :)

page_cache_release(), indeed. My bad...

> Should non-page cache related code use get_page() and
> __free_page() directly? Or should the page_cache_* macros be
> used everywhere?

The non-page cache related code should use get_page() and
__free_page() (put_page?) directly. There may come a day
where the pagecache page size can be different from the
page size ...


Hollywood goes for world dumbination,
Trailer at 11.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.031 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site