[lkml]   [2000]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Patch] performance enhancement for simple_strtoul

> > It seems gcc creates much better code with the variables set to register
> > types.
> Curious. GCC should be generating the same code regardless; ah well.
> Is strtoul actually used in the kernel other than for the occasional
> (rare) write to /proc/sys and parsing boot options?
> > But this is the kernel and there are people that would reject my patch
> > purely on the basis that it adds precious bytes to the kernel.
> Perhaps I am mistaken but I'd expect it to be called what, ten times at
> boot time, and a couple of times when X loads the MTRRs?

On second thought, ps -auxl maybe stresses simple_strtoul a little
bit. Not sure.

> Sounds like the neatest trick would be reducing bytes used here...

I'm "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.103 / U:1.560 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site