[lkml]   [2000]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: iptables: "stateful inspection?"
Alan Cox wrote:

> There have been at least five holes found in pile that _could_ have been
> [speech]
> safe is the day you end up hurt.

Your specific example of an executable (windows) attachment, not buffer
overflows, etc. what what I was replying to. In general, you are
correct. Now, how about including that procfs cleanup patch that I sent,
and maybe the 64-bit printk patch? :)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.053 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site