[lkml]   [2000]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: /dev/random: really secure?
    At 09:21 AM 12/18/2000 +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
    > > There are hidden sources of entropy. One is clock skew between
    > the keyboard
    > > processor's clock, the keyboard controller's clock, and the CPU clock
    > > generator's PLL. Another is data motion between the CPU cache and main
    >In the RFC 1750, they write it is not recommended to rely on computer
    >clocks to
    >generate random. Isn't it this case?

    This is the case, but the important thing that David Schwartz said is that
    it does not rely on the time in a clock, but rather on the pretty much
    completely random skew between several independent clocks. Any particular
    oscillator will vary in speed semi-randomly, and if you compare multiple
    clocks you can get pretty random numbers.

    This message has been brought to you by the letter alpha and the number pi.
    Open Source: Think locally; act globally.
    David Feuer

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.019 / U:1.228 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site