lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: kernel-doc minor fix
    On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 04:41:44PM +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
    > --- /usr/src/linux/scripts/kernel-doc Tue Dec 12 11:25:59 2000
    > +++ kernel-doc Sat Dec 16 15:53:17 2000
    > @@ -664,10 +664,11 @@

    > ##
    > # takes a function prototype and spits out all the details
    > -# stored in the global arrays/hsahes.
    > +# stored in the global arrays/hashes.
    > sub dump_function {
    > my $prototype = shift @_;

    > + $prototype =~ s/^const+ //;
    > $prototype =~ s/^static+ //;
    > $prototype =~ s/^extern+ //;
    > $prototype =~ s/^inline+ //;

    Since when did C accept constttttttttttttttttttt and staticcccccccc?
    etc.

    Should that be " +" not "+ " or is someone just trying to confuse me?
    Or did someone try to mean s/foo//g by adding a +?


    Yours confusedly,

    Simon.

    --
    [ "Therapy is expensive. Popping bubble wrap is cheap. You choose." ]
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.023 / U:0.256 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site