lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.2.18 signal.h
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 05:55:08PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> > x()
> > {
> >
> > switch (1) {
> > case 0:
> > case 1:
> > case 2:
> > case 3:
> > ;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > Why am I required to put a `;' only in the last case and not in
> > all the previous ones?
>
> That `;' above is NOT in just the last one. In your above
> example, all the labels will execute the same `;' statement.
>
> In fact, the default behaviour of the switch() operation is
> to fall through to the next defined label and you have to put
> in an explicit `break;' if you want to prevent `case 0:' from
> reaching the `;' below the `case 3:'...

Are you kidding me?

Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.064 / U:27.564 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site