Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 11 Dec 2000 21:46:44 -0500 | From | Wakko Warner <> | Subject | Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools] |
| |
> Daryll> On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 09:34:59PM -0500, David Feuer wrote: > >> For what it's worth, I absolutely agree with this. I have the same > >> impression when I just see the word "dangerous". > > Daryll> Why not call a spade a spade and label it BROKEN. I do think > Daryll> that's stronger than DANGEROUS. > > I doubt it will make any difference whatever we write. I have seen > several times how users enable every single option because 'they don't > want to miss out on anything'. It's at the order of someone with a > Macintosh enabling something labelled "Atari internal serial port > support" (theoretical example, no offense).
How about reversed?
The option comes enabled by default, but the coding is change to fit this below:
<M> NTFS support [*] disable ntfs write support
But after reading other comments, having it be a forced mount r/w is better. (just like I have to force other FS to be mounted r/o instead of default r/w)
-- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |