[lkml]   [2000]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools]
> Daryll> On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 09:34:59PM -0500, David Feuer wrote:
> >> For what it's worth, I absolutely agree with this. I have the same
> >> impression when I just see the word "dangerous".
> Daryll> Why not call a spade a spade and label it BROKEN. I do think
> Daryll> that's stronger than DANGEROUS.
> I doubt it will make any difference whatever we write. I have seen
> several times how users enable every single option because 'they don't
> want to miss out on anything'. It's at the order of someone with a
> Macintosh enabling something labelled "Atari internal serial port
> support" (theoretical example, no offense).

How about reversed?

The option comes enabled by default, but the coding is change to fit this

<M> NTFS support
[*] disable ntfs write support

But after reading other comments, having it be a forced mount r/w is better.
(just like I have to force other FS to be mounted r/o instead of default

Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.047 / U:0.460 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site