Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 1 Dec 2000 15:35:05 -0800 (PST) | | From | "T. Camp" <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mutliple root devs (take II) |
| |
> Hmmm, I don't like your array thing (also in v.I of the patch), > limiting us to <n> possible root devices, where n==8. A better > approach might be to iterate over the root= arguments when mounting. I > know why you used the array -- easier to code. I was unsure if it was okay to be using kmalloc during early stages of init/main.c so I decided to follow the example allready set and just use a static array - can anyone advise on being able to do this dynamically?
> One potential problem with the patch is that you have changed behavior > some people are relying on. If you use 'syslinux' to boot, for > example, the SYSLINUX.CFG file can define a default command line > including root=. Then you can augment that line at runtime by typing > in your own command line. Your patch makes it impossible, in this > situation, to override the default root device from the syslinux > command line. A kludge to make it work again would be to process the > root devices in reverse. That would be ugly and unintuitive, though. Yeah you would need to patch lilo as well to handle the new syntax amongst other things. I use grub and have no troubles along these lines. Refrencing the idea in the follow on message about just using the last root= only and not allowing multiple root= would work around this. I guess I can't think of any really good reason why having multiple root= is a necissary feature.
t.
Fear the future? Change the past. This message has resulted in an increase in the entropy of the universe
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |