[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface (GKHI)
       Date: 	Thu, 9 Nov 2000 13:39:04 +0000 (GMT)
    From: Paul Jakma <>

    I actually think Linus has been too loose/vague on modules. The
    official COPYING txt file in the tree contains an exception on linking
    to the kernel using syscalls from linus and the GPL. nothing about
    binary modules, and afaik the only statements he's ever made about
    binary modules were off the cuff on l-k a long time (unless someone
    knows a binary module whose vendor can show a written exception from
    Linus et al).

    Actually, he's been quite specific. It's ok to have binary modules as
    long as they conform to the interface defined in /proc/ksyms.

    That being said, the real problem with the GKHI is that as Al said, it
    does expose internal kernel interfaces --- and the Linux kernel
    development community as a whole refuses to be bound by such interfaces,
    sometimes even during a stable kernel series.

    So someone who releases only binary modules will likely be in a world of
    hurt. And that's considered a feature. Certainly no one is going to
    go out of their way to make life easier for binary module authors.

    - Ted
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:0.020 / U:23.344 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site