lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: malloc(1/0) ??
    Date
    Followup to:  <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011080149010.32613-100000@server.serve.me.nl>
    By author: Igmar Palsenberg <maillist@chello.nl>
    In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
    >
    >
    > > The program does not work. A program works if it does what it's supposed to
    > > do. If you want to argue that this program is supposed to print "ffffff"
    > > then explain to me why the 'malloc' contains a zero in parenthesis.
    > >
    > > The program can't possibly work because it invokes undefined behavior. It
    > > is impossible to determine what a program that invokes undefined behavior is
    > > 'supposed to do'.
    >
    > May I remind you guys that a malloc(0) is equal to a free(). There is no
    > way that any mem get's malloced.
    >

    Where the heck did you get idea?

    -hpa
    --
    <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
    "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
    http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:6.380 / U:0.628 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site