lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch] NE2000
    Date
    Hello!

    > > In any case, Andrew, where is the race, when we enter in sleeping state?
    > > Wakeup is not lost, it is just not required when we are not going
    > > to schedule and force task to running state.
    >
    > set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
    > add_wait_queue(...);
    > /* window here */
    > set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
    > schedule();
    >
    > If there's a wakeup by another CPU (or this CPU in an interrupt) in
    > that window, current->state will get switched to TASK_RUNNING.
    >
    > Then it's immediately overwritten and we go to sleep. Lost wakeup.

    Look into code yet. It looks sort of different. Again:

    > > Wakeup is not lost, it is just not required when we are not going
    > > to schedule and force task to running state.

    So that it is right not depening on anything.

    Alexey
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:0.030 / U:30.980 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site