lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: malloc(1/0) ??
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 02:11:34PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011080149010.32613-100000@server.serve.me.nl>
> By author: Igmar Palsenberg <maillist@chello.nl>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel

[snip]

> > May I remind you guys that a malloc(0) is equal to a free(). There is no
> > way that any mem get's malloced.
> >
>
> Where the heck did you get idea?
>
> -hpa

Probably from the malloc man page where it is stated that *realloc*
with size 0 equals free :)
--
Rasmus(rasmus@jaquet.dk)

Which is worse: Ignorance or Apathy?
Who knows? Who cares?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:0.033 / U:0.896 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site