lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: USB init order dependencies.
Date

rmk@arm.linux.org.uk said:
> No. As I said elsewhere in this thread, the USB OHCI chip is not
> accessible until other board-specific initialisation has happened.
> This is done via an initcall. Unfortunately, moving usb_init() back
> into init/main.c will mean that USB is again initialised before any
> initcalls, which means for these boards USB will be non-functional
> without additional changes over and above just moving usb_init().

But OHCI init isn't called from usb_init() is it?

The proposal is only to move the single call to usb_init() back into
init/main.c - not to move all the USB initcalls back.



--
dwmw2


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:0.041 / U:0.832 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site