Messages in this thread |  | | From | David Woodhouse <> | Subject | Re: USB init order dependencies. | Date | Tue, 07 Nov 2000 18:27:37 +0000 |
| |
rmk@arm.linux.org.uk said: > No. As I said elsewhere in this thread, the USB OHCI chip is not > accessible until other board-specific initialisation has happened. > This is done via an initcall. Unfortunately, moving usb_init() back > into init/main.c will mean that USB is again initialised before any > initcalls, which means for these boards USB will be non-functional > without additional changes over and above just moving usb_init().
But OHCI init isn't called from usb_init() is it?
The proposal is only to move the single call to usb_init() back into init/main.c - not to move all the USB initcalls back.
-- dwmw2
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |