Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 6 Nov 2000 01:40:09 -0800 (PST) | From | Andre Hedrick <> | Subject | Re: Kernel 2.4.0test10 crash (RAID+SMP) |
| |
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Neil Brown wrote: > > It looks like an interupt is happening while another interrupt is > > happening, which should be impossible... but it isn't. > > If multiple interrupts are hitting a single code path (like IDE irqs 14 > -and- 15), you definitely have to think about that. The reentrancy > guarantee only exists when a single IRQ is assigned to a single > handler... Jeff,
This is likely the classic case where the driver hangs on to the global lock way to lock because it is grabbed to early wrt what I am changing the behavior to...
Cheers,
Andre Hedrick CTO Timpanogas Research Group EVP Linux Development, TRG Linux ATA Development
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |