Messages in this thread |  | | From | Bernd Eckenfels <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] document ECN in 2.4 Configure.help | Date | Tue, 07 Nov 2000 03:38:35 +0100 |
| |
In article <Pine.LNX.4.10.10011060113240.8248-100000@waste.org> you wrote: > I'm still not sure why it's been decided not to do fallback or how this > whole situation is any different from path MTU discovery.
Because this will add a Fallback (non ECN) packet to every denied target. I think this is bad policy at least. It might violate the RFCs, too. Keep in mind, we cannot recognice a rejection due to ECN.
Greetings Bernd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |