[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] document ECN in 2.4
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:02:47AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > with the TCP ECN_ECHO and CWR flags set, to indicate
> > ECN-capability, then the sender should send its second
> > SYN packet without these flags set. This is because
> Now that is nice. The end user perceived effect is that folks with faulty
> firewalls have horrible slow web sites with a 3 or 4 second wait for each
> page. The perfect incentive. If only someone could do the same to path mtu
> discovery incompetents.

And it penalizes good guys.
If the host cannot answer to the first SYN for some legitimate reason
then it'll never be able to use ECN.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:0.142 / U:0.696 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site