Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 6 Nov 2000 09:17:17 -0500 (EST) | From | George Talbot <> | Subject | Re: Can EINTR be handled the way BSD handles it? -- a plea from a user-land |
| |
You know, a more concise way of stating my underlying question might be:
Does POSIX require that programs be aware of signals, in the "returning EINTR" sense, if they do not use signals, and only use pthreads?
I might want to write a program that uses pthreads instead of signals to handle asynchronous program behavior so that said program might be portable to a system that implements pthreads but not signals.
-- George T. Talbot <george@moberg.com>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |