Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 05 Nov 2000 15:52:39 -0700 | From | Tim Riker <> | Subject | Re: non-gcc linux? |
| |
Alan Cox wrote: > > > Perhaps I did not explain myself, or perhaps I misunderstand your > > comments. I was responding to a comment that we could just copy some of > > the optimizations from Pro64 over into gcc. Whether Pro64 understands > > gcc syntax is immaterial to this question is it not? > > If gcc is architecturally unable to do ia64 well, pro64 is free software and > both understand the same syntax Im at a bit of a loss why that is productive
Alan Cox wrote in another message: > Or a third party decides its a silly situation and does it anyway
A definite possibility. -- Tim Riker - http://rikers.org/ - short SIGs! <g> All I need to know I could have learned in Kindergarten ... if I'd just been paying attention. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |