Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 5 Nov 2000 13:39:28 +0100 | From | Dominik Kubla <> | Subject | Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations... |
| |
On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 06:48:47PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Because -fs is usually used by filesystems itself. Since the journaling > layer doesn't really have a publically visible name, it's easy to change.
Oh i understood that fine. But VFS = "virtual filesystem switch" is also not a filesystem per se. And why give the generic term to an IBM "product"? So i say leave jfs for generic code and call the IBM jfs "ibmjfs".
Just my 2 cents, Dominik Kubla -- http://petition.eurolinux.org/index_html - No Software Patents In Europe! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |