[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: ext3 vs. JFS file locations...
On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 06:48:47PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> Because -fs is usually used by filesystems itself. Since the journaling
> layer doesn't really have a publically visible name, it's easy to change.

Oh i understood that fine. But VFS = "virtual filesystem switch" is also
not a filesystem per se. And why give the generic term to an IBM "product"?
So i say leave jfs for generic code and call the IBM jfs "ibmjfs".

Just my 2 cents,
Dominik Kubla
-- - No Software Patents In Europe!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:0.032 / U:0.564 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site