[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: CLONE_NAMESPACE, links for dirs and mount(2) for normal users questions
Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Remi Turk]
> > Do I understand correctly that this means hardlinks to directories
> > (except . and ..) are fundamentally impossible in Linux?
> Why do you want to be able to do that? Use symlinks or loopback mounts
> and stay out of trouble.

Probably just because I'm crazy ;-)
Of course I could use symlinks or loopback mounts, but it itn't nearly
as much fun as a directory which really contains itself :-)

> > (I'm thinking about trying to write a garbage collected filesystem
> > with hardlinks to directories.)
> Sounds like a lot of extra complexity. Is this academic or do you have
> a practical use for it?

Well, I might find some practical use for it some day.

(I got inspired by an old thread about garbage collecting filesystems
without a clear answer about whether it was possible to write one in
and the recent thread "[BUG] Inconsistent behaviour of rmdir")

> Peter

Linux 2.4.0-test11-ac4 #1 Tue Nov 28 15:51:01 CET 2000
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:47    [W:0.140 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site