[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] blindingly stupid 2.2 VM bug

On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 04:35:32PM -0800, John Kennedy wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 01:04:16AM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 03:36:15PM -0800, John Kennedy wrote:
> > > No, it is all ext3fs stuff that is touching the same areas your
> >
> > Ok this now makes sense. I ported VM-global-7 on top of ext3 right now
> > but it's untested:
> Not for long. (:
> >
> Is ext3-0.0.3b the most current/stable?

Yes. 0.0.5b is out with metadata-only journaling, but it hasn't had
the same amount of testing which 3b has had.

> at least) it looks like
> ext3-0.0.2f is current (which is what I've been using), but under the
> test directory I see ext3-0.0.3b as well as ext3-0.0.5b. I haven't
> heard anything new about ext3fs in a long, long time.

linux-fsdevel has had a fair amount of traffic on it, and there's also ( to subscribe). You
won't have seen much if you've only been watching linux-kernel.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:49    [W:0.053 / U:3.924 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site