Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 03 Nov 2000 22:53:04 +0800 | From | Michael Boman <> | Subject | ext3 vs. JFS file locations... |
| |
Hi Gurus,
I was trying to build a super-big kernel with allot of Journaling File System inside it to try out what is best for us to use. Now, I encountered a problem..
It seems like both IBM's JFS and ext3 wants to use fs/jfs .. IMHO that is like asking for problem.. A more logic location for ext3 should be fs/ext3, no?
Anyway, just my thought... It might already been discussed for what I know..
BTW.. If you find time to reply on this post, please put me on the Cc: line - I am not on the mailinglist, generates too much mail I have no time to read...
Best regards Michael Boman
PS I was using 2.2.17 as base for my patches.. DS
-- Pager : out of order | On the contrary of what you may Mobile: (+65) 98 55 17 34 | think, your hacker is fully aware eMail : michael.boman@usa.net | of your company's dress code. He ICQ : 5566009 | is fully aware of the fact that it Handle: proxy / 11 Alliance | doesn't help him to do his job. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |