Messages in this thread |  | | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: USB init order dependencies. | Date | Fri, 3 Nov 2000 10:38:38 +0000 (GMT) |
| |
Dunlap, Randy writes: > David is entitled to his opinion (IMO). > And I dislike this patch, as he and I have already discussed. > > Short of fixing the link order, I like Jeff's suggestion > better (if it actually works, that is): go back to the > way it was a few months ago by calling usb_init() > from init/main.c and making the module_init(usb_init); > in usb.c conditional (#ifdef MODULE).
However, that breaks the OHCI driver on ARM. Unless we're going to start putting init calls back into init/main.c so that we can guarantee the order of init calls which Linus will not like, you will end up with a lot of ARM guys complaining.
Linus, your opinion would be helpful at this point. _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King rmk@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |