Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations... | Date | Fri, 3 Nov 2000 15:38:56 +0000 (GMT) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> It seems like both IBM's JFS and ext3 wants to use fs/jfs .. IMHO that > is like asking for problem.. A more logic location for ext3 should be > fs/ext3, no?
fs/jfs is the general purpose journalling layer. Of course while thats very sensible it does clash with the ibm jfs. Maybe fs/journalling is needed ?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |