Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 4 Nov 2000 02:29:05 +0100 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: SETFPXREGS fix |
| |
On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 12:13:33PM +1100, Gareth Hughes wrote: > Yes, we can certainly mask out the mxcsr value in both cases. I just ^^^ s/can/must/
> think this makes the code a lot simpler and cleaner as a result - three
I agree about the three vs one copy issue. Anyways my first priority was that the the code was safe, and the previous one was completly safe too (ok, I admit I had to check out the asm generated before trusting it 8).
Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |