[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0"
Followup to:  <>
By author: Alan Cox <>
In newsgroup:
> That isnt what Andries is arguing about. Read harder. Its semantic differences
> rather than code differences.
> static int a=0;
> says 'I thought about this. I want it to start at zero. I've written it this
> way to remind of the fact'
> Sure it generates the same code

The problem is that it doesn't. One could argue this is a gcc bug or
rather missed optimization.

One can, of course, also write:

static int a /* = 0 */;

... to make it clear to human programmers without making gcc make bad

<> at work, <> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:47    [W:0.376 / U:4.316 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site