Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 25 Nov 2000 12:16:54 -0700 | From | "Jeff V. Merkey" <> | Subject | Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy |
| |
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 03:26:15PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
Rik,
We refuse to use it here at present. Builds from it have a lot of problems, for some reason. Andre is looking into it more deeply than I, but I agree with your assessment.
Jeff
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Neil Brown wrote: > > On Friday November 24, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote: > > > >> ... RedHat's GCC snapshot "2.96" handles this case just fine. > > > > > > > Now, if you can isolate the relevant part of the diff between > > > > 2.95.2 and RH 2.96... > > > > > > Maybe I have to be more precise in the statement "gcc 2.95.2 is buggy". > > [image from FTP site not buggy] > > > > This is from a SuSE distribution, I forget which, not very recent. > > > Revised summary: gcc-2.95.2-51 from SuSE is buggy. > > > > Ditto for gcc-2.95.2-13 from Debian (potato). It exhibits the > > same bug. Debian applies a total of 49 patches to gcc and the > > libraries. > > The gcc-2.95.2-6cl from Conectiva 6.0 is buggy too. > > (and the ISO images haven't even been available for > one week yet ... *sigh*) > > regards, > > Rik > -- > Hollywood goes for world dumbination, > Trailer at 11. > > http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/ > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |