Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 23 Nov 2000 22:30:08 -0800 (PST) | From | Andre Hedrick <> | Subject | Re: ext2 filesystem corruptions back from dead? 2.4.0-test11 |
| |
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
> > > On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > > What the F*** does that have to do with the price of eggs in china, heh? > > Just maybe if you could follow a thread, you would see that that Alex Viro > > has pointed out that changes in the FS layer as dorked things. > > ? > If you have a l-k feed from future - please share. I'm not saying that
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 04:37:21 -0500 (EST)
> fs/* is not the source of that stuff, but I sure as hell had not said > that it is. I simply don't know yet.
You were pointing out changes to reproduce the effect.
> > Since there have been not kernel changes to the driver that effect the > > code since 2.4.0-test5 or test6 and it now randomly shows up after five or > > six revisions out from the change, and the changes were chipset only. > > generic_unplug_device() was changed more or less recently. I doubt that > it is relevant, but...
Cool, the issue was that I get tried of people blaming the ATA subsystem for things that it does not do or has control over. Basically, I kill bogus threads that try to tag me with an old problem of the past that was a hardware issue.
Given the latest stats that more than 90% of the linux install base is hinged on me getting the low-level engine core correct, I go on benders when cheap shots are take across the bow.
Now the only issue that is even on the radar map is a potential 1GB cross copy execution where I have a single report that md5sums do not match. I have yet to reproduce it even with the identical hardware sent to me.
I questioned _A_ about this and there may be a case that is OS independent which is more important to me than other. This is a non-fixable for 6->12 months, until I kick some tail in the standards committee meetings over this point. If it is a reality, Linux and Microsoft will join as the OS's represented there and force the change. Only because there are potentical side-bars that NT is effected also in these rare cases.
Cheers,
Andre Hedrick Linux ATA Development
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |