lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: Address translation
From
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 10:04:18PM +0100, Bjorn Wesen wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Andreas Bombe wrote:
> > > I may be wrong on this, but I thought that copy_{to,from}_user are
> > > only necessary if the address range you are accessing might cause a
> > > fault which Linux cannot handle (ie. one which would cause the
> > > application to segfault if it accessed that memory). If it is only a
> >
> > It is wrong. copy_*_user handle the page faults, whether they are good
> > faults (swapped out, copy on write) or bad faults (illegal access).
> > Without these macros you get the "unable to handle kernel page fault"
> > oops message if a fault occurs.
>
> Yes but only if it's a real fault, not if the address range actually is
> a valid VMA which needs paging, COW'ing or related OS ops. copy_*_user
> does not do the access in any different way than a "manual" access or
> memcpy does, it just adds a .fixup section that tells the do_page_fault
> handler that it should not segfault the kernel itself if the copy takes a
> big fault at any point, instead it should jump to the fixup which makes
> the copy routine return an error message.

You're right, I remembered wrong.

> > > (1) In a "top half" thread, can I now access this memory without the
> > > access macros (since I know the address range is valid)?
> >
> > The address is valid, the pages probably aren't. In fact, extending the
> > address space only creates read-only mappings to the global zeroed page
> > if I remember right.
>
> But it does not matter that the pages aren't there physically, any kind of
> access (including an access from kernel-mode) will bring about the same
> COW/change-on-write mechanism as copy_to_user or a user-mode access would.

However these faults can let you sleep (swap-in, or swap-out to make
room for a COW page). That's defined for the uaccess macros, but might
come very unexpected with a memcpy. Unexpected sleeps alone can make a
crash if the surrounding code does not allow it.

It's a moot point anyway, memcpy with user space is illegal.

--
Andreas E. Bombe <andreas.bombe@munich.netsurf.de> DSA key 0x04880A44
http://home.pages.de/~andreas.bombe/ http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:47    [W:0.044 / U:3.664 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site