[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] O_SYNC patch 3/3, add inode dirty buffer list support to ext2
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 12:01:35PM +0000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> Hi,
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 11:54:24AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> >
> > I have not implemented O_SYNC in NWFS, but it looks like I need to add it
> > before posting the final patches. This patch appears to force write-through
> > of only dirty inodes, and allow reads to continue from cache. Is this
> > assumption correct
> Yes: O_SYNC is not required to force reads to be made from disk.
> SingleUnix has an "O_RSYNC" option which does that, but O_SYNC and
> O_DSYNC don't imply that.

Cool. ORACLE is going to **SMOKE** on EXT2 with this change.


> Cheers,
> Stephen
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:47    [W:0.042 / U:3.480 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site