[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Address translation

> otherwise valid) I think the access macros are unnecessary. I would be
> *very* glad if someone could confirm this, or shoot me down. :)
> For instance, a kernel module I am writing allocates some memory in
> the current process's address space as follows:
> down(&mm->mmap_sem);
> s->table = (void **)get_unmapped_area(0, SIZEOF_TABLE);
> if ( s->table != NULL )
> do_brk((unsigned long)s->table, SIZEOF_TABLE);
> up(&mm->mmap_sem);
> Some questions:
> (1) In a "top half" thread, can I now access this memory without the
> access macros (since I know the address range is valid)?
> (2) Can I also access this memory from an interrupt/exception
> context, or must I lock it? (ie. can faults be handled from such
> a context)

poof! I've shooted you.

You may definitely access such memory from interrupt.

Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt,
details at

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:47    [W:0.066 / U:1.348 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site