lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date

Sorry for the rather lengthy email list. I am not sure exactly
which of you it would be appropriate to put this question to.

I am writing a pci_device_id table for ohci1394.c. This will
allow a userland program to automatically load the module when an
ohci1394 card is present. There is a PCI device class for ohci1394
controllers (pci_dev->class == 0x0c0310). So, is there some reason
why linux-2.4.0-test11/drivers/ieee1394/ohci1934.c contains a list
of vendor_id/device_id pairs?

If ohci1394.c really needs to match based on vendor_id and
device_id, then I will generate a pci_device_id table accordingly.
On the other hand, if ohci1394.c really does not need to care about
vendor_id/device_id pairs, I will add the generic pci_device_id table
for an ohci1394 controller, and I would also be happy to generate
a patch for you folks that eliminates the use of the vendor_id / device_id
pairs, and, if you want, ports the driver to the new hotplug PCI
interface, which might be useful, considering that I see ieee1394
CardBus cards everywhere.

Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Adam J. Richter __ ______________ 4880 Stevens Creek Blvd, Suite 104
adam@yggdrasil.com \ / San Jose, California 95129-1034
+1 408 261-6630 | g g d r a s i l United States of America
fax +1 408 261-6631 "Free Software For The Rest Of Us."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:47    [W:0.020 / U:0.360 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site