lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Linux 2.4.0test11-ac1
Date
From
> APICs (probably due to the fact there was no standalone I/O APIC chip
> available at that time) so CPUs report no APIC flag. And it starts in the
> PIC mode as opposed to the Virtual Wire. I may send you his bootstrap log
> if you want to (but not today -- I don't have it handy).

Ok. That means my check is over zealous.

> Could you please tell me what these broken boards report in MP-tables
> when there is no APIC? Maybe we could find a way to distinguish them.
> All 82489DX-based boards I've met report 0x1 as the APIC revision (I don't
> think there are higher 82489DX revisions).

I think it reports 1.1 apics from memory. Its simply hardcoded in the bios
rather than the configurable flash area.

The following change should make all of this work

if(vendor!=INTEL && !has_apic)
/* No SMP */



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:47    [W:0.047 / U:19.236 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site