[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: silly [< >] and other excess
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 12:26:30AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> Albert D. Cahalan writes:
> > > Function entered at [<c2800060>] from [<c0026194>]
> > > Function entered at [<c0025ac0>] from [<c0016860>]
> > > Code: e51f2024 e5923000 (e5813000) e3a00000 e51f3030
> >
> > All those numbers get looked up. Keep going for another 25 lines too.
> Oh, missed this one. Here you're wrong again. The numbers in [< >]
> should be looked up, and no others. The code can look exactly like
> a kernel address. In this case you definitely do NOT want to have
> them converted.

Okay. How about just using some prefix to the hex number, such as '>'?
It'll still save plenty of space, and would be trivial changes for the

____/| Ragnar Højland Freedom - Linux - OpenGL Fingerprint 94C4B
\ o.O| 2F0D27DE025BE2302C
=(_)= "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for 104B78C56 B72F0822
U chaos and madness await thee at its end." hkp://

Handle via comment channels only.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:47    [W:0.069 / U:1.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site