[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux 2.4.0test11-ac1
> > MP table regardless of the capabilities of the CPU installed. Its apparently
> > legal to do so. There is an apic capability flag that should be tested before
> It's not legal -- the MPS is very explicit the MP-table must reflect a
> real configuration.

Intel tell me otherwise. The real world also disagrees which makes the
discussion a little pointless. We have to handle the real situation where
this occurs

> > making any assumptions about APIC availability on a processor.
> OK, but how does it handle the 82489DX? There are valid configurations
> using this kind of APIC, including Pentium P54C ones...

These processors don't report the APIC on the cpuid ? If so then I guess
the fix is something like this

if( cpuid says there is no local apic && vendor != intel)

Intel stuff appears to always be happy poking in APIC space. I don't know
if this is related to the chip internals on the non APIC capable chips.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:47    [W:0.046 / U:0.488 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site