Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 20 Nov 2000 14:37:46 -0500 (EST) | From | "Mohammad A. Haque" <> | Subject | Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represents Linux |
| |
To Charles: I see your intentions but you really want to take this up with Redhat and some linux advocacy groups. linux-kernel really doesnt need to deal with things like gcc being broken and such (which I don't think is your case; check your hardware -- my reason? I've deployed RH 6.2 on 20 or so server, all scsi, without a hitch. also signal 11 points to memory problems).
To list: Could we please come across to users a little more politely? I know its frustrating when people come barging in complaining about something that really should be directed somewhere else. But it's heck of alot better if we don't have a user that later thinks 'Damn, linux developers are meanies' and then are afraid to ask us questions later which wuld probably be useful for us. I'm not saying I was right by simply blowing off Charles by telling him this is the wrong list. I should have pointed him in the right direction and given quick pointers.
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote: > (1) Most nasty-grams were from those who didn't even read the subject. > And yes, it should be of great concern to those on the linux- > kernel development list. The most visible advocate of Linux > is Red Hat. When they drop the ball, it's a concern for all > the developers.
--
===================================================================== Mohammad A. Haque http://www.haque.net/ mhaque@haque.net
"Alcohol and calculus don't mix. Project Lead Don't drink and derive." --Unknown http://wm.themes.org/ batmanppc@themes.org =====================================================================
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |