Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 20 Nov 2000 13:44:39 -0500 (EST) | From | "Mohammad A. Haque" <> | Subject | Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represents Linux |
| |
Same experince here....
Boxes ran perfectly fine with Windows (95/98/NT) but barfed with linux. RAM replacement fixed it. Now whenever I see a signal 11 with gcc memory is the first thing I go after.
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, John Jasen wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote: > On this note, I recall a time that I 'appropriated' a workstation for > linux. > > It was pulled out of the student labs, where it had worked for 3 months > running NT 4.0, but the RH install kept on crashing out. > > I could even reinstall NT 4.0. > > *shrug* > > Eventually traced it down to memory, and had our hardware hacks replace > it. > > Sometimes hardware problems can be subtle.
--
===================================================================== Mohammad A. Haque http://www.haque.net/ mhaque@haque.net
"Alcohol and calculus don't mix. Project Lead Don't drink and derive." --Unknown http://wm.themes.org/ batmanppc@themes.org =====================================================================
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |