Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Nov 2000 13:22:28 -0500 | From | John Jasen <> | Subject | Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represents Linux |
| |
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:
> (4) For those who think the hardware is broken; The hardware worked > for six months using Windows/2000. It has a NT core.
On this note, I recall a time that I 'appropriated' a workstation for linux.
It was pulled out of the student labs, where it had worked for 3 months running NT 4.0, but the RH install kept on crashing out.
I could even reinstall NT 4.0.
*shrug*
Eventually traced it down to memory, and had our hardware hacks replace it.
Sometimes hardware problems can be subtle.
-- -- John E. Jasen (jjasen1@umbc.edu) -- Some elections you just can't buy. For others, there's GORE 2000
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |