[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represents Linux
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:

> (4) For those who think the hardware is broken; The hardware worked
> for six months using Windows/2000. It has a NT core.

On this note, I recall a time that I 'appropriated' a workstation for

It was pulled out of the student labs, where it had worked for 3 months
running NT 4.0, but the RH install kept on crashing out.

I could even reinstall NT 4.0.


Eventually traced it down to memory, and had our hardware hacks replace

Sometimes hardware problems can be subtle.

-- John E. Jasen (
-- Some elections you just can't buy. For others, there's GORE 2000

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:47    [W:0.201 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site