Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Nov 2000 13:16:06 -0800 | From | Ben Ford <> | Subject | Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represents Linux |
| |
Ya, I also had a system that ran many OS's great, including Linux, Win98, Win2k, etc. However when I went to install NT on it, the CPU overheated every time. Ya, I know, doesn't make sense, but that's how it was.
-b
John Jasen wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote: > > > (4) For those who think the hardware is broken; The hardware worked > > for six months using Windows/2000. It has a NT core. > > On this note, I recall a time that I 'appropriated' a workstation for > linux. > > It was pulled out of the student labs, where it had worked for 3 months > running NT 4.0, but the RH install kept on crashing out. > > I could even reinstall NT 4.0. > > *shrug* > > Eventually traced it down to memory, and had our hardware hacks replace > it. > > Sometimes hardware problems can be subtle. > > -- > -- John E. Jasen (jjasen1@umbc.edu) > -- Some elections you just can't buy. For others, there's GORE 2000 > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |