Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 02 Nov 2000 12:31:51 -0700 | From | Tim Riker <> | Subject | Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10?) |
| |
Ben Ford wrote: > > Tim Riker wrote: > > > Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > > > 1. There are architectures where some other compiler may do better > > > > optimizations than gcc. I will cite some examples here, no need to argue > > > > > > I think we only care about this when they become free software. > > > > This may be your belief, but I would not choose to enforce it on > > everyone. Thank you for you opinion. > > No need to be so flip about it. I believe that most of us feel that way.
Me or Alan? I did not mean this as a dig. I feel strongly that one should have the choice here. I do not choose to enforce my beliefs on anyone else. I am suggesting only that others should provide the same courtesy. I truly meant "Thank you for you opinion". I feel the community benefits from the differing opinions contained within it.
> > -b > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- Tim Riker - http://rikers.org/ - short SIGs! <g> All I need to know I could have learned in Kindergarten ... if I'd just been paying attention. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |