[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.4.0-test10-pre6: Use of abs()
    Richard Henderson wrote:
    > On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 09:46:19AM -0500, wrote:
    > > What versions of gcc produce the built-in functions?
    > 2.95 and previous. In 2.96 somewhere we fixed a bug that
    > automatically prototypes these builtin functions for you;
    > ie with current code you get an undeclared function warning.
    > > And does it do so for *all* platforms? (i.e., PPC, Alpha,
    > > IA64, etc., etc., etc.)
    > Yes. The thing about abs, though, is that it's "int abs(int)"
    > which does naughty things with longs on 64-bit targets. You're
    > much better off writing (x < 0 ? -x : x) directly.

    Thank's for answering it... I was already looking up the GCC source for
    an exact answer ;-). However what's the difference in respect of
    optimization between unrolling the abs function by hand and
    relying on the built in?
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.042 / U:5.924 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site