Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 2 Nov 2000 21:27:30 +0100 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10?) |
| |
In article <20001102212124.A15054@gruyere.muc.suse.de> you wrote: > You also forgot named structure initializers, but C99 supports them > again with a different syntax than gcc [I guess it would have been too easy > to just use the gcc syntax]
The named initializers syntax in C99 is from plan9, besides beeing probably older, it is from the C creators and more logic ;)
I think that are enough reasons for the ANSI people to not choose the GCC syntax.
Christoph
-- Always remember that you are unique. Just like everyone else. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |