Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 18 Nov 2000 19:10:58 -0500 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: [CFT] dmfe.c network driver update for 2.4 |
| |
Tobias Ringstrom wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Frank Davis wrote: > > > > I would rather fix those non-SMP compliant drivers to be SMP compliant, > > then keeping them 'broken'. Adding the print statements would only be a > > temporary solution. > > Of course. This list of priorites is very natural, I think: > > 1. Working SMP driver > 2. Broken SMP driver with a warning. > 3. Broken SMP driver without a warning. (Even if "everyone" knows it > is broken) > > It takes less than a minute to add such a warning, but it can take days > or weeks to find someone to really fix the driver. That was my point.
Marking them with a #warning is fine with me.
-- Jeff Garzik | Building 1024 | The chief enemy of creativity is "good" sense MandrakeSoft | -- Picasso - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |