lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ?
Date
From
> What is the difference between a module that exports no symbols and
> includes EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS reference, and such a module that lacks
> EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS?
>
> Alan once upbraided me for assuming they were the same :)

EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS - nothing exported
MODULE_foo - export specific symbol

none of the above, export all globals but without modvers

The behaviour may have changed with newer modutils, its originally there for
compatibility in the earlier days of the module stuff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:47    [W:0.054 / U:0.504 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site