[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: BTTV detection broken in 2.4.0-test11-pre5
    Gerd Knorr wrote:
    > It simply did'nt work correctly and often used to misdetect
    > random bt848 cards as either MIRO or Hauppauge (which where the first
    > available cards).

    Well, this means there's yet another mandatory __setup parameter :-(

    Should it be called bttv_card or bt484_card (i.e. are there cases
    where a user would want to override the card detection for non-848
    bttv cards ?)

    Likewise, in my radio patch, I called the parameter bt848_radio,
    following the naming convention chosen for the config option. If
    there are other chips, this may not be a good idea. Should I rename
    this one to bttv_radio or are there no radios on non-848 chips ?
    (I'll make a patch with both setup functions, since the
    documentation changes overlap anyway.)

    - Werner

    / Werner Almesberger, ICA, EPFL, CH /
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:47    [W:0.019 / U:33.256 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site