lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Missing ACKs with Linux 2.2/2.4?
Date
In article <200011121428.RAA16557@ms2.inr.ac.ru> you wrote:
> Sorry, ignoring some values of timestamp is simply impossible.
> It is PAWS. One packet is more than enough to kill you. 8)

Hmm... Isnt this only important for the first SYN with a Zero Timestamp
which is not very critical for PAWS?

Greetings
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:47    [W:0.020 / U:5.156 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site