[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [BUG] Inconsistent behaviour of rmdir
Followup to:  <>
By author: David Feuer <>
In newsgroup:
> . and foo/. are also links, not directories... the directories themselves
> are filesystem internal objects, and not discussed by the standard. I
> didn't know that linux supported hard links to directories... Isn't that
> just asking for trouble?

It is on filesystems which has ".." physically on disk. Linux no
longer requires this, although for example ext2 does have this.

I don't believe it's inherently impossible in Linux anymore. In fact,
vfsbinds provide a lot of the same kind of functionality; the main
difference between vfsbinds and hard links are that the former (a) can
cross filesystem boundaries and (b) aren't persistent.

<> at work, <> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:47    [W:0.046 / U:2.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site