[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: shm swapping in 2.4 again
On 16 Nov 2000, Christoph Rohland wrote:

> Oh, I missed one point: we need to handle the swapout of
> nonattached pages: in shm you can detach the last user and the
> segment with content is still around. So we have to scan the shm
> objects themselves also. Should We could do this in the same
> loop as we scan the mm's?

Sounds like a good idea. If we scan the nonattached segments
just as agressively as we scan the mm's, things should be
balanced just fine.

> Also we have to make sure to derefence the swap entry if the
> last reference is in the shm segmant table .

Why is this?


"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:47    [W:0.068 / U:1.736 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site